“News Fast,” an editorial in the March 12, 2012 issue of the Jesuit magazine America, puts a new spin on Lenten fast-and-abstinence. Bringing a private practice into the public forum, the editorial posits that “there is one civic practice Christians might think of giving up: election news.”
Wow, did that resonate with me, a former MSNBC addict who gave up cold-turkey last Lent. I had discovered the non-stop arguing-head fests during the 2008 election cycle and became, well, addicted. Or mesmerized or fascinated or whatever word you want to use. For three years. It was so easy to watch and listen and give in! Finally, on a retreat — a silent retreat — I decided to take seriously the idea of “guarding my senses” by at least using the channel selector, if not always the on-off switch, on my TV.
My MSNBC excuse was that I was educating myself. There was some of that, sure. But I was also agitating myself to no good end and allowing the spaces in my imagination to be filled up with the mental equivalent of someone else’s Twinkies.
Like a good Jesuit spiritual director, the America editorial goes on to suggest specific positive actions to replace what’s being given up — for example, “surveying the news of the world rather than ingesting the trivia of election-year journalism,” or “every evening (taking) 20 minutes to read about an issue — the Keystone XL pipeline, the Eurozone crisis, the withdrawal from Afghanistan — rather than taking in the evening news.”